 |
| The slippery slope. |
It's interesting to watch omnivores grappling with their food choices. I just finished reading an article in the
Toronto Star defending meat eating.
"Why Consuming Animals May Be the Right Thing to Do," said the headline.
Echoing a
New York Times contest in March asking readers to defend meat consumption in 600 words or less (which, not surprisingly, the big food industry/factory farm shill
Temple Grandin entered), the
Star published a litany of familiar excuses justifying the act of killing animals and then devouring them.
Author and
New Yorker contributor
Adam Gopnik led the charge: "All animals die. The choice for a pig is not between painful death and perpetual life, but between one death and some other. If we ate only animals that died naturally, then could there be any rational objection to our eating them - to eating their flesh in celebration of their life rather than burying it to rot or merely burning it?"
Toronto butcher
Stephen Alexander, a big supporter of buying local, "humanely" raised meat, is clearly wrestling with the ethics of meat eating when he tells the
Star: "You're killing them to live, you're killing them because you enjoy meat and it's good for you. But at the end of the day, there is the cold, hard truth that you're killing animals to eat their meat.... You have to justify it to yourself and that's all there is to it."
"Ethics are an individual choice," reasoned
Heather Travis, who handles public relations for
Canada Beef Inc., which represents 83,000 farming families here in Canada. Travis said her organization "strongly advocates beef as part of a balanced diet," and warned that staying healthy on a meat-free diet "can be trickier if you eliminate animal protein sources from your diet."
The temptation is great to pick apart these arguments one by one, and most intelligent vegans would be able to dance circles around these people in a debate.
But to me the most interesting element of all of these defenses of meat eating is the extent to which omnivores feel the need these days to justify the act. Five years ago, when I was an omnivore, I never felt any need to defend my choices. I liked meat. I ate it. End of story.
Today, five years later, more and more people are either going vegan, or feeling the need to justify and explain their food choices. I run into thoughtful omnivores all the time who are really - really - struggling with consuming animal products. Increasingly, it's getting so only an over-the-top fruit loop like
Ted Nugent gives absolutely no thought whatsoever to chowing down on the flesh of sentient beings.
 |
| Famous food journalist Mark Bittman. |
For the rest of us, it's a different story. I personally think the
New York Times' challenge - which triggered an avalanche of responses from across the country - was a useful exercise in getting omnivores to think about
why they do what they do.
A decade ago, the renowned and widely respected
New York Times food journalist
Mark Bittman gave little or no thought to the animals he was cooking (by his own admission). But in recent years, Bittman has developed profound misgivings about eating animals. These days, he believes that "20 or at most 50 years from now, those of us still alive will express incredulity at the way we once treated animals destined to become food." (
Source)
 |
| Gordon Ramsay and friend. |
Bittman is not alone. Not long ago, famous TV chef
Gordon Ramsay watched a hidden camera video of the inside of a factory farm (in this case, a pig facility). Seeing the male pigs being castrated without any anesthesia, sows chewing nervously on bars, and pigs shrieking in horror during the last days of their short lives, Ramsay was visibly shaken - and disgusted - by what he witnessed. Of course, Ramsay didn't go vegan. But the treatment of animals, an issue that for the longest time was never on his radar, has entered into his consciousness.
Bittman has been much more aggressive in moving away from cooking animal products than Ramsay. In fact, Bittman gained fame for his
Vegan Until 6 diet, spotlighted in his book
Food Matters, that advocated going vegan before dinnertime for improved health. Yet what began for Bittman as a health issue keeps coming back to the more significant matter of animals and their suffering. He can't get away from the issue. These days, in fact, he keeps bringing it up. It haunts him, just as it haunts any thoughtful omnivore. And this trend is working its way into corporate America.
Burger King made headlines in late April when the chain announced it will switch to cage-free eggs and pork by 2017. Other fast food restaurants are likely follow.
 |
Pigs in a factory farm. Many omnivores are troubled
by what's happening in the food industry. |
We vegans tend to be somewhat dismissive toward omnivores who are struggling with their food choices. But it's impossible to overemphasize the importance of this development, because it's a very new one. And it's becoming more and more widespread. Recently, I went on a local radio station to talk about these very issues on a program about farming and agriculture. I could see the host, himself an omnivore and advocate of what he called "humane" livestock farming, was also grappling with these same issues. He and I shared a sense of uneasiness with the growth of big, corporate factory farms. A lot of omnivores, having watched documentaries like
Food Inc. and Forks Over Knives, are experiencing these same feelings. I believe Bittman is absolutely correct, that "20 or at most 50 years from now, those of us still alive will express incredulity at the way we once treated animals destined to become food." This is not a Pollyannaish notion. It's a reflection of the changing reality of our times.
A growing number of omnivores are troubled by their actions, and the increasing defensiveness of some is an outgrowth of a moment in history when the animal rights movement is gaining traction around the world. For those of us who feel passionately about animals and their rights, this shift may seem too slow and way overdue in coming. But it is happening, little by little, and it offers a glimmer of hope.